Analysis: 3 Contradictions From Trump Team on Stormy Daniels Payment

President Donald Trump and one of his new attorneys admit he reimbursed his longtime fixer for a payment made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, a striking reversal from what the president said just a few weeks ago. 

 See the source image
But team Trump’s attempts to clear up the matter is full of contradictions.
Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, now one of the lead attorneys on Trump’s personal legal team, told Fox News on Wednesday night the president repaid fixer and attorney Michael Cohen for $130,000 he transmitted to Daniels (real name Stephanie Clifford) in return for her silence about an alleged sexual encounter when Trump was a reality show star.
Giuliani contends the payment and alleged reimbursement “is going to turn out to be perfectly legal. … That money was not campaign money. ... No campaign finance violation.” (Some experts who have tweeted and gone on cable news since the interview aired, however, say Giuliani’s comments do not clear up campaign finance violation questions.)
The next morning, Trump fired off three tweets that replaced his typical fire-and-brimstone tone with a more lawyerly one. In one, the president contended Cohen got a “monthly retainer, not from the campaign and having nothing to do with the campaign.” From that pool of funds, Cohen “entered into, through reimbursement, a private contract between two parties, known as a non-disclosure agreement, or NDA,” Trump wrote, referring to Daniels.
The president also described that non-disclosure pact as being used by his legal team “to stop the false and extortionist accusations made by her about an affair.” Daniels went on CBS’s “60 Minutes” program to claim she had a consensual sexual encounter with Trump in the early 2000s and was later threatened and paid to remain silent. As he did Thursday morning, Trump denies the encounter and his surrogates have denied the threats took place.
But much of what Giuliani said Wednesday night and Trump tweeted Thursday morning are direct contradictions of what he and his top aides have said — even as recently as seven days ago. Let’s count the contradictions:

Air Force One

Trump came back to the press cabin on the executive jet in April to take a few questions. He was asked whether he had knowledge of the $130,000 payout before it was made. “No,” he replied. A reporter followed up: “Do you know where he got the money to make that payment?”
“No,” the president responded. “I don’t know.”
On March 7, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said she was not aware of the president having knowledge of the payment when it was made.
Wednesday night, however, Giuliani claimed Trump “didn’t know about the specifics of it, as far as I know” at the time it was paid out. “But he did know about the general arrangement, that Michael would take care of things like this,” Giuliani said.
On Air Force One in April, Trump also was asked why Cohen paid Daniels six figures in the first place. He responded: “You’ll have to ask Michael Cohen. Michael is my attorney, and you’ll have to ask Michael Cohen.”
The operative word is “attorney.”
Previous Post Next Post

Ads

نموذج الاتصال